City offices will be closed Dec. 24-25 and Jan. 1. Trash pickup will be delayed one day from Dec. 25-29. Garbage will be collected New Year's Day. FMI:

Holidays to impact trash pickup, City office closures 

City offices will be closed Dec. 24-25 and Jan. 1 for the Christmas and New Year’s holidays. There will be no trash pickup on Christmas Day, though garbage will be collected on New Year’s Day.

Garbage collection will be delayed one day from Dec. 25 through Dec. 28. So, Tuesday’s routes will be serviced on Wednesday. Wednesday’s routes will be serviced on Thursday, and so on into Saturday. Routes for commercial customers may also lag by a day during that span.

Among the City operations that will be closed: Station 618 and Santa Fe Crossing senior centers, the Parks and Recreation offices, Southside and Carl Ray Johnson recreation centers, the San Angelo-Tom Green County Health Department, the Animal ShelterFairmount Cemetery’s business offices, Municipal Court and the Nature CenterWomen, Infants and Children (WIC) will be closed Dec. 21-25, Dec. 28 and Jan. 1.

City offices will reopen at 8 a.m. on Wednesday, Dec. 26, and on Wednesday, Jan. 2.

Fort Concho and its visitors center, 630 S. Oakes St., will also be closed Dec. 24-25 and Jan. 1. It will otherwise be open for self-guided tours during its normal hours. For more information, visit

Paper, Nos. 3-7 plastics no longer accepted recyclables 

Mixed papers and Nos. 3-7 plastics will no longer be accepted in the City’s curbside recycling program under a contract change the City Council approved today.

Those items are being excluded from the recycling stream because they are not profitable commodities. The acceptable recycling materials are:

  • Flattened corrugated cardboard.
  • Boxboard, cereal and frozen food boxes.
  • No. 1 and 2 plastics. No. 1 plastics include soda and water bottles, mouthwash bottles, peanut butter containers, salad dressing and vegetable oil containers. The latter three should be cleaned before recycling. No. 2 plastics include milk jugs, juice bottles; bleach, detergent and household cleaner bottles; and shampoo bottles.
  • Steel, tin and aluminum cans.
  • Empty aerosol cans.

Customers will continue to receive curbside recycling pickup every other week, alternating with bulk pickup on their collection day. There will be no change in the rates customers pay.

“We are pleased to be able to continue to offer this service to our citizens, which contributes to both the preservation of natural resources and the extension of our landfill’s lifespan,” City Manager Daniel Valenzuela said.

Customers who use their recycling bins as a second garbage can are subject to have the green containers removed. A second garbage bin is available for an additional monthly cost.

Our Home. Our Decisions.

That’s the theme of a Texas Municipal League campaign the City Council has endorsed voicing concern about state government overreach into issues and decisions that are best determined at the local level.

The message is straightforward and sensible: Citizens should have a voice in matters that impact us, our neighbors and our community. Texas is far too large and too diverse for politicians gathered in Austin to decree one-size-fits-all solutions for Frisco and Laredo and San Angelo.

We confronted just such an issue two years: short-term rentals. You may recall this debate pitted the view that San Angeloans should be able to rent their homes for brief periods while they are away versus the argument that such rentals diminish the quality of life in residential neighborhoods.

About the same time Austin was also wrestling with concerns about short-term rentals. In each instance, the respective City Councils forged compromises that didn’t make everyone happy, but seemed to have served their communities well.

So, no one could reasonably argue the issue of short-term rentals demanded a state solution. And yet, into that fray the state is wading.

The state attorney general has sought to have Austin’s short-term rental ordinance overturned in court. A Texas legislator last year tried to pass a state law regulating short-term rentals; another such effort is expected once lawmakers convene in January.

During the upcoming legislative session, other pre-emption laws are expected regarding plastic bags, payday lending, tree ordinances … and, believe it or not, chickens. (The Texas Senate in 2017 passed a bill that would require cities to allow homeowners to allow up to six chickens in a backyard.)

The most worrisome proposition is artificially capping the property tax revenue a city can generate. Proposals have ranged from 2.5 percent to 6 percent of what was collected the prior year.

On the surface, that’s an appealing idea. But it would surely spark unintended consequences. For example, cities could be forced to end property tax abatements as an incentive to lure private investment and jobs.

Even more vitally, revenue caps would hamper public safety efforts.

More than 52 percent of the City of San Angelo’s general fund budget is dedicated to our police and fire departments; the property tax accounts for 46 percent of the general fund’s revenue. In essence, every penny of property tax collected is spent providing and supporting police officers and firefighters.

Over the past two years, the City has added 10 officers and 16 firefighters. Those additions will translate into quicker response times and greater protection. Had San Angelo been subject to an artificial revenue cap, adding first-responders might not have been possible.

This effort to reduce the local property tax burden is, frankly, misguided. Texans pay far more in school taxes than city taxes. That’s because state lawmakers have gradually shifted the burden of funding schools from the state to the local level. If the Legislature is earnest in reducing the local tax burden, it will reverse the trend and fund schools to a greater extent.

Another troublesome proposal calls for mandatory elections to issue certificates of obligation, which are a financing tool.

San Angelo is using CO’s to fund $80 million in street projects … without raising the property tax rate. Keeping in mind that all of our property taxes are essentially devoted to public safety and the state wishes to cap revenue, imagine how we would otherwise fund those street improvement efforts. (We couldn’t.)

In short, the most important decisions we make as a community involve the sorts and levels of services we want and how much we are willing to pay for them. That decision can best be made here in San Angelo, not in Austin.

The City is fortunate to have a collaborative working relationship with state Rep. Drew Darby, whose efforts at the state capitol have benefited our community immeasurably. Unlike some of his colleagues, Rep. Darby has never sought to handcuff locally elected officials. Perhaps that is because he is a former San Angelo City Council member and better understands the plight of local government.

Others in state government have expressed interest in pre-empting local regulations, calling state oversight a superior approach. We disagree.

Like all Texans, San Angeloans don’t want to be told we must conform to one way of thinking or one way of living – regardless of whether that comes from Washington or Austin. Neither do we care whether our neighbors in Frisco and Laredo make decisions that differ from ours.

As our friends at the Texas Municipal League point out, whether it’s burnt orange or maroon, sweetened or unsweetened, or red salsa or green … there’s no one way of being Texan. That said, there is one thing we can all agree upon: We want to continue making our own decisions about our hometowns. And that’s especially true here in San Angelo.

Daniel Valenzuela is San Angelo’s city manager. Contact him at 325-657-4241 or

City IDs, pursues next water supply

The City of San Angelo has identified the leading option for its next water supply and taken the first step toward its development.

The Concho River Water Project is a move to extend San Angelo’s sources beyond its lakes and the Hickory Aquifer. It will do so by adding a reliable and sustainable source that will help meet water needs for decades to come.

The project involves releasing highly treated water from the City’s wastewater treatment plant into the Concho River. After it has flowed down that “natural pipeline,” the water will be recouped farther downstream. From there, it will be piped to the water treatment plant, where it will be treated to drinking standards.

“This is water San Angelo already has,” said attorney Jason Hill, the City’s special counsel for water. “We’re just able to make better use of it. It’s a win-win for the community.”

On Sept. 18, the City Council unanimously agreed to pursue state permits that will ensure the water is treated to adequately high standards before its release into the river.

Prior to recommending the Concho River project, engineers and City staff studied 24 possible water supplies. Those included surface water, groundwater and direct reuse. The experts and City officials concluded the Concho River Water Project is a reliable and cost-effective source, will produce water with an improved taste, can be developed relatively quickly, and utilizes proven science. Cities have long released their treated wastewater downstream into streams, rivers and lakes. Treated wastewater from Ballinger, Robert Lee and Winters, for instance, flows into San Angelo’s primary water source, Ivie Reservoir.

“We are releasing it into the Concho so we have what we call an environmental buffer,” said Scott Hibbs, principal water resource engineer with eHT, an Abilene engineering firm. “So we’re letting Mother Nature take care of some of the treatment aspects.”

Securing state permits could take as little as two to three years. Completing the entire project could take about five years and will cost about $120 million dollars. That includes upgrades to the water and wastewater treatment plants. Those improvements would be needed regardless of which new water source was chosen.

When completed, the Concho River Water Project will produce about 7.5 million gallons per day. By comparison, the Hickory Aquifer is currently capable of producing 8 million gallons per day, although that is being expanded to 12 million gallons. San Angelo averages about 12 million gallons of daily usage.

Work continues by the West Texas Water Partnership to develop a long-term source that can serve San Angelo, Abilene and Midland. The Concho River Water Project will help meet local water demands for about the next 50 years.

 “This takes San Angelo a long ways down the road of water security,” Hill said. “And when I say a long ways, I’m talking generationally … 2060, 2070.”

The project will also diversify San Angelo’s portfolio of water sources. Because the City will not be dependent upon any one source of water, San Angelo will be better able to weather times of drought.

FAQs on Concho River Water Project

For five years now, making San Angelo water secure has been the City Council’s top stated priority. That means ensuring the community not only has a reliable infrastructure but an ample supply. Adequate water is important for daily living, to protect the public’s health, to maintain our excellent quality of life and to foster economic development. 

The newly proposed Concho River Water Project is a tremendous step toward making San Angelo water secure.

What is the Concho River Water Project?

The Concho River Water Project is a move to extend San Angelo’s water supply beyond our reservoirs and the Hickory Aquifer. The project adds a reliable addition to the City’s water supply options. It represents a significant step forward in the City’s continuing efforts to secure the water it needs to thrive for generations to come.

The project will involve discharging water treated to federal and state standards into the Concho River and then recouping that water farther downstream at a City-owned facility on the river. The water will then be sent to our water treatment plant, where it will be treated even further to drinking standards.

Why is this the leading option for growing San Angelo’s water supply?

Cheap, easy-to-develop water supplies are the exception, not the rule. The City commissioned a water feasibility study that assessed 24 possible water supplies. Those included more surface water, more groundwater and direct potable reuse. Based upon the data and information provided by the consultants hired by the City, staff and the City Council agree the project checks all the boxes.

Compared to other options, the project will:

  • Provide a reliable and secure source of water.
  • Yield an economical water supply.
  • Produce water with an improved taste.
  • Reduce potential legal and political hurdles.
  • Involve a shorter timeframe in which it can be accomplished.
  • Utilize proven science in terms of water quality, hydrology and engineering.

Another exciting aspect of the Concho River Water Project is it will piggyback with existing City water infrastructure investments that need to – and likely will – occur with or without the project.

How much water will this project yield?

Approximately 7.5 million gallons per day, even during severe droughts. San Angelo averages about 12 million gallons of daily usage over the course of a year. By comparison, the Hickory Aquifer is currently capable of producing 8 million gallons per day (although an expansion of that to 12 million gallons is underway).

Perhaps the greatest advantage of this project is that it makes greater use of San Angelo’s existing water supplies. As a result, it’s a guaranteed source of water – one that will expand as our community grows. That is, as San Angelo uses more water, it will be released into the Concho and then recouped for further use.

What’s the first step?

The City Council on Sept. 18 approved the pursuit of two necessary state permits: one to release water into the Concho River and the other to recoup the water at City-owned facilities downstream. Additionally, City staff was directed to start designing significant, long-overdue improvements to our water treatment and reclamation facilities.

Why are improvements to the wastewater treatment plant needed?

The Concho River Water Project will involve treating water that passes through our reclamation facility to an even higher quality so (in keeping with the state permit) it can be released into the Concho. Using the river as a “natural pipeline” to move water to our water treatment plant will negate the need for more large transmission lines. Plus, it allows the community to use water that already belongs to us that would otherwise be lost downstream or elsewhere.

Will this take care of all of the City’s water supply problems?

The Concho River Water Project, when combined with our reservoirs and the Hickory Aquifer, is projected to move San Angelo a long way toward addressing its water needs through 2070. It will add to and diversify the city’s water portfolio. That means San Angelo won’t be so reliant on any one source – such as lakes – and can better weather times of drought. 

It will also put the City in a far more secure position should one of our water sources be offline. By adding more than 7 million gallons of water per day to our system, this project makes a remarkable difference in San Angelo’s water security.

That said, San Angelo will never stop its search for more water. Our regional partnership with the cities of Abilene and Midland will continue its work to develop a long-term water source that can serve all three communities. We will always work non-stop to ensure our community has a bright future.

How much will it cost?

The project is anticipated to cost about $120 million.  Coincidentally, that is the same amount spent to develop the Hickory Aquifer. As with that project, the City would pursue low-interest financing through the Texas Water Development Board.

The Concho River Water Project will include upgrades to our aged water and water reclamation plants, the former of which is approximately 100 years old. Those projects would have to be accomplished even if we chose a different water supply or strategy.

Updated plants with 21st-century technology and better treatment capabilities will also allow us to treat water from all of our surface water sources to a higher standard. That should yield a better-tasting water, which is a goal for any water supply project.

How long will it take?

Permitting timelines can range from two to three years, so the project could feasibly be completed within five years. That may well depend upon legal and political challenges.

How is this different than what we currently do?

Currently, the City treats this water and delivers it for irrigation. So, the city will be using a highly valuable resource after treating it to a level that will improve overall water quality.

Is this a reuse project?

This is not a so-called “toilet-to-tap” project, which concerns some. Direct potable reuse would be more expensive and, after the treatment process, would yield less water.

Using rivers and streams to transport treated wastewater has been used for decades. Cities commonly discharge water into a river that is later picked up by a downstream neighbor, or by the city itself, and used for drinking water. In fact, Ballinger, Robert Lee and Winters release its treated wastewater downstream to flow into Ivie Reservoir, San Angelo’s primary water source.  

The Concho River Water Project will capture San Angelo’s own water, expanding and diversifying the city’s water portfolio. Because we will be retrieving the same amount of water we are releasing, the efficiency of the Concho River Water Project will be extremely high. 

Mayor Gunter on Concho River Water Project

San Angelo’s mayor and City Council routinely make decisions that affect individuals and groups. It’s not often, however, that we cast a vote that will impact hundreds of thousands of lives for generations to come. Sept. 18 was such a day. Brenda Gunter

Following an executive session discussion, the Council unanimously agreed to seek a pair of state permits to allow the development of San Angelo’s next water source – a supply that will yield at least 7.5 million gallons daily well beyond any of our lifetimes.

After years of study that spanned dozens of options, the City’s elected officials and its management are resolute in our pursuit of what we’re calling the Concho River Water Project.

In short, this effort will extend San Angelo’s water supply beyond our lakes and the Hickory Aquifer. It will give our community a reliable and replenishing source that will see us through even the most severe droughts. And it will produce tastier drinking water at a cost-effective rate.

The Concho River Water Project involves releasing highly treated water from the City’s wastewater treatment plant into the Concho River. The river would serve as a natural pipeline and buffer, transporting the water farther downstream to a City-owned facility. From there the water would be piped back to the water treatment plant to undergo further treatment to drinking standards.

After analyzing options that ranged from surface supplies to groundwater to direct reuse, our experts, both in the Water Utilities Department and an outside engineering firm, concluded the Concho River Water Project “checked all the boxes.” It will give us:

  • A reliable and secure source of water.
  • A cost-effective water supply.
  • Water that is more aesthetically pleasing.
  • Fewer legal and political hurdles than are typically involved with developing a supply.
  • A shorter timeframe in which it can be accomplished.
  • A process that utilizes proven science in terms of water quality, hydrology and engineering.

That last point refers to the longtime practice of cities nationwide releasing their treated wastewater downstream for use by another community. In fact, Ballinger, Robert Lee and Winters’ treated wastewater flows into San Angelo’s primary water source, the Ivie Reservoir.

The state permits will ensure our wastewater is treated to a high standard for release into the river. We anticipate the project could be completed within five years at a cost of about $120 million.

Coincidentally, that mirrors the expense of the Hickory Aquifer. As it successfully did for that project, the City will pursue low-interest financing for the river project from the Texas Water Development Board.

Much of the cost of the Concho River Water Project involves badly needed upgrades to our water and wastewater treatment plants – improvements that are necessary independent of this project. That’s because parts of the water plant are 100 years old. Updated plants with 21st-century treatment capabilities will also allow us to treat water from our lakes to a higher standard. Designs on those improvements will soon begin.

When finished, the Concho River Water Project will produce approximately 7.5 million gallons per day. That is comparable to the 8 million gallons the Hickory Aquifer can produce (although an expansion to 12 million gallons is underway). The river project equates to about 60 percent of San Angelo’s average daily water usage.

Even better, the Concho River Water Project makes greater use of our existing water supplies. How? As San Angelo uses more water, it will eventually be released into the river and recouped for further use.

 Lastly, this project will diversify San Angelo’s portfolio of water sources, a needed addition to our existing lake supplies and our groundwater in the Hickory. Because we won’t be reliant on any one source for water, that will make us more prepared for the sorts of extreme drought we’ve experienced since 2011. That’s an enviable position for any city to be in, particularly in West Texas, where water is scarce.

That does not mean our march for more water is over. Our work with the cities of Abilene and Midland continues, as the West Texas Water Partnership searches for a water source that could serve all three communities. Frankly, the work of finding more water will never end … nor should it. Such is the importance of water to ensure that San Angelo continues to thrive for generations to come.

Brenda Gunter is the mayor of the City of San Angelo. Contact her at

State of the City

City Council 2017-6

(Back row, left to right, Lane Carter, District 5; Tom Thompson, District 2; Daniel Valenzuela, City Manager; Tommy Hiebert, District 1; Harry Thomas, District 3. Front row, left to right, Billie DeWitt ,District 6; Brenda Gunter, Mayor; Lucy Gonzales, District 4.)

The City Council is a seven-member policy board for the City of San Angelo. 

The Council meets twice a month at the McNease Convention Center, 500 Rio Concho Drive. Meetings are open to the public and are usually held on the first and third Tuesday of every month at 8:30 a.m.  

Gunter hosts, strategizes with West Texas mayors

west texas mayors

The Beatles, I think, got it right. We do, indeed, get by with a little help from our friends.

With that in mind, a group of West Texas mayors has been meeting quarterly to discuss shared interests, to dissect challenges, to brainstorm creative solutions, to offer support and to pool our political might. Brenda Gunter

Recently, I had the honor and pleasure of hosting my fellow mayors from Abilene, Amarillo, Big Spring, Lubbock and Midland. (Unfortunately, Odessa’s mayor was unable to attend.) During their stay, I got to show off our revitalized downtown and the Concho River walk. The latter is the envy of every other West Texas community because of the quality of life it represents and the catalyst it has become for new development that embraces history, the arts, culture and entertainment.

Each of our mayoral meetings begins with an agenda that focuses on one or more issues that are shared by the cities or have become problematic for at least one of our communities. Because our recent gathering occurred shortly after the West Texas Legislative Summit, we felt strongly we should capitalize on some of the messages that emerged from that.

To that end, I invited state Rep. Drew Darby, who hosted the summit, to attend and guide us on what we as mayors can do to help shape issues of interest, importance and impact in the legislative session that begins in January. He smartly suggested we spread our wings and consider how much more political power we could wield if we banded together with other rural regions.

That can’t be overstated. All of West Texas has less representation both in the Legislature and in Congress than the city of Houston. So we mayors feel strongly that, with our common goals and objectives, we must unite to maximize the region’s political influence.

That could make a real difference in an effort such as improving our transportation infrastructure. We share a common need for better roads. The question is, how do we gain the support to get it done?

Efforts such as the Ports to Plains corridor and the proposed expansion of Interstate 14 through San Angelo to Midland are hugely important to the region’s economic vitality, especially as it relates to moving fuel, food and fiber to market.

So, San Angelo and Lubbock are making pitches to Abilene, Midland and Odessa to join in the push for the Ports to Plains corridor, even if it doesn’t run directly through their cities. Why? Well, oil produced in the Permian Basin has to go someplace … and it needs a sturdy, convenient infrastructure for getting there.

That doesn’t necessarily require an interstate. So-called “super-two” highways with ample passing lanes – think of U.S. Highway 277 from here to Sonora – make a tremendous difference in the ease and safety of travel. The Ports to Plains alliance was a player in the development of the super-twos.

Our sister cities need to be part of the journey to get the corridor done. The alliance needs as many partners and players as possible. Everyone has to have a stake and a voice as to what happens.

And so, the mayors will be lobbying as a cohesive unit for transportation improvements when the Legislature convenes next year. In preparation for that, we will next meet in October to craft some thoughts to send to lawmakers later this year. And, we will seek others to join that effort while ensuring we have a defined game plan for the session.

  On another front, we West Texas mayors are rallying around Amarillo’s struggle to land a Texas Tech veterinary school. That effort is opposed by other state universities. But we see and support the need to train more veterinarians to serve rural communities.

In the same vein, we would hope that down the road when San Angelo has a big want, that will be supported by the other mayors. Again, that’s because one city on its own will have more difficulty getting something done. However, six or seven voices all saying the same thing and repeating it over and over again to our representatives is hugely important.

We all want to know we have someone in our camp who wants us to succeed – just as we want our neighbors to succeed. It’s good to know you can pick up the phone to say, ‘Hey, this is going on here. What are you guys doing about it?’

Our best lessons can be learned from and our strongest support can come from other cities – our friends.

Brenda Gunter is the mayor of the City of San Angelo. Contact her at 325-450-8734 or

City Council member profiles

Mayor Brenda Gunter


Tommy Hiebert, District 1


Tom Thompson, District 2


Harry Thomas, District 3

Lucy Gonzales, District 4


Lane Carter, District 5

Billie DeWitt, District 6

Who is your City Council member?

Watch City Council meetings

City Council meetings air daily on SATV (Suddenlink cable channel 17 & 117) at 10:30 a.m. and 7 p.m. 



Free viewers are required for some of the attached documents.
They can be downloaded by clicking on the icons below.

Acrobat Reader Flash Player Windows Media Player Microsoft Silverlight Word Viewer Excel Viewer PowerPoint Viewer